Barristers

Michael Newbold

Download PDF
Michael Newbold

Called

2004

Appointments

Grade 2 Prosecutor on the CPS  Advocates Panel

Practice Areas and Specialisations

Proceeds of Crime
Michael is frequently instructed in proceeds of crime cases. He has experience of advising and representing both the Prosecution and Defendants at all stages of the confiscation process including appeals, with a particular emphasis on the enforcement of confiscation orders.
He has extensive experience of:

•    Restraint Proceedings (including those involving multi-million pound claims to assets by third parties)
•    Confiscation Hearings
•    Receivership Proceedings (in the High Court and Crown Court – both Management and Enforcement Receivership proceedings)
•    Certificate of Inadequacy Applications
•    Certificate of Increase Applications
•    Enforcement Hearings (including potential breaches of Article 6 ECHR on grounds of alleged delay in enforcing confiscation orders)

Michael has also been instructed to act in related civil proceedings, acting in charging order, insolvency and family proceedings for Prosecuting Authorities seeking to safeguard assets for the purposes of satisfying confiscation orders. He has previously spent time on secondment to the Asset Forfeiture Division of RCPO.

Cash Forfeiture/ Civil Recovery

Michael regularly acts in proceedings pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“POCA”) for the detention and forfeiture of seized cash, both at first instance and on appeal.
Following a period on secondment to SOCA, Michael also has experience of proceedings for the civil recovery of the proceeds of crime pursuant to Part 5 POCA.
Michael has been instructed in proceedings in the First Tier Tribunal (Tax) in cases where repayment of VAT has been denied on the basis of a connection with (Missing Trader) fraud.

Criminal Law
Michael is regularly instructed to prosecute and defend cases across the criminal spectrum. He has experience of prosecuting for the CPS, the RCPO, the DWP, the Royal Mail, Ofcom, Capita and various local authorities.
He has a particular interest in regulatory offences, and is often instructed on behalf of local authorities and defendants in such diverse areas as benefit fraud, breach of abatement notices and failure to comply with food hygiene regulations (both in respect of declaratory relief on a civil complaint and criminal breaches).

Education and Qualifications

Qualified to receive instructions through direct public access
Bar Vocational Course - Nottingham Law School, (2003-2004)
BA (Hons) Jurisprudence - Hertford College, Oxford, (2000-2003)

Memberships

Criminal Bar Association
Proceeds of Crime Lawyers’ Association

Cases of Interest

Regina v Alves (2011) EWCA Crim 1375 Instructed by the Prosecution in an appeal against a Confiscation Order. Also instructed in an earlier application for variation of a restraint order by an interested party and an application for variation of the Order pursuant to s.23 POCA. Subsequently instructed in proceedings for an increase in the Order pursuant to s.22 POCA.

Re Sangha – Administrative Court
Confiscation enforcement. Instructed in proceedings for variation of a restraint order / application to include properties (valued in excess of £1.5 million) within a receivership order. The case involved complex issues as to admissibility of evidence in the High Court proceedings and the tainted gift provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

Re B – Administrative Court
Instructed on behalf of the prosecution in successful proceedings for the appointment of an enforcement receiver by the High Court. Subsequently instructed to advise and represent the receiver in proceedings before the Administrative Court for permission to issue a writ of possession to enforce an agreed sale of the Defendant's matrimonial home.

Regina (Jenn) v. Ealing Magistrates' Court – Administrative Court
Instructed on behalf of the interested party in judicial review proceedings arising out of the decision of the magistrates' court to commit the Claimant to a term of imprisonment in default of payment of over £850,000 in fines, compensation and costs orders. The principal arguments for the Claimant centred on an alleged breach of Article 6 through delay in enforcing the orders.

Re Stapleton – Blackfriars Crown Court
Confiscation enforcement proceedings. Instructed in response to an application for variation of a Confiscation Order following grant of a Certificate of Inadequacy in relation to an historic order obtained following conviction for ‘Missing Trader’ Fraud.

Re B – Leicester Crown Court
Instructed for the Prosecution in an application to commit a third party to prison for failure to repatriate monies as ordered in a POCA Restraint Order relating to allegations of pre-confiscation dissipation of proceeds of sale of a property.

Re Singh- Canterbury Crown Court
Application for appointment of an enforcement receiver. The application was contested by the Defendant’s wife on the basis of an asserted equitable interest in the family home and her Article 8 right to respect for her family life.

HMRC v Johnson and Obidegwu – Crawley Magistrates’ Court; Lewes Crown Court
Acted in cash forfeiture proceedings in relation to over £160,000 of cash seized at premises associated with Respondents convicted of drug trafficking offences. The proceedings were contested by interested parties, including on appeal by an interested party to the Crown Court.


Chambers Email

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Secure Email

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Barrister search results